<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MetaLib v4.00</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.meanboyfriend.com/overdue_ideas/2006/09/metalib-v400/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.meanboyfriend.com/overdue_ideas/2006/09/metalib-v400/</link>
	<description>Ideas linking Libraries, Computing, E-learning, and anything else that springs to mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:48:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.meanboyfriend.com/overdue_ideas/2006/09/metalib-v400/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 05:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meanboyfriend.com/overdue_ideas/?p=270#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Was there any discussion of usability, in addition to accessibility, of the current version of MetaLib either formally or informally?
I notice discussion of this topic in the recent smug4eu newsletter http://www.igelu.org/sfxmetalib/newsletter/smug4eu_issue3.pdf/view and we have also had feedback from users at UEA that the interface is not intuitive so I&#039;m a bit disappointed that it will be largely the same in version 4. Will the tweaks mentioned make enough of a difference?
As with the Aleph OPAC Ex Libris seems to be looking to PRIMO to provide the really simple interface - but I fear this will be at the expense of the existing OPAC and MetaLib interfaces. Also, PRIMO can&#039;t replace some aspects of existing interface such as subject categories for example.
Is anyone else concerned about usability issues?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was there any discussion of usability, in addition to accessibility, of the current version of MetaLib either formally or informally?<br />
I notice discussion of this topic in the recent smug4eu newsletter <a href="http://www.igelu.org/sfxmetalib/newsletter/smug4eu_issue3.pdf/view" rel="nofollow">http://www.igelu.org/sfxmetalib/newsletter/smug4eu_issue3.pdf/view</a> and we have also had feedback from users at UEA that the interface is not intuitive so I&#8217;m a bit disappointed that it will be largely the same in version 4. Will the tweaks mentioned make enough of a difference?<br />
As with the Aleph OPAC Ex Libris seems to be looking to PRIMO to provide the really simple interface &#8211; but I fear this will be at the expense of the existing OPAC and MetaLib interfaces. Also, PRIMO can&#8217;t replace some aspects of existing interface such as subject categories for example.<br />
Is anyone else concerned about usability issues?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
