<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Reference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.meanboyfriend.com/overdue_ideas/2009/06/quick-reference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.meanboyfriend.com/overdue_ideas/2009/06/quick-reference/</link>
	<description>Ideas linking Libraries, Computing, E-learning, and anything else that springs to mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:03:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen Stephens</title>
		<link>http://www.meanboyfriend.com/overdue_ideas/2009/06/quick-reference/comment-page-1/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen Stephens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meanboyfriend.com/overdue_ideas/?p=490#comment-250</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think in principal there is any difference between referencing a specific scene in a film, and a specific page in a book. However, what I do wonder is whether it is useful to differentiate between general references and the more specific. To take an example from the APA Guide at http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/02/

&quot;If you are directly quoting from a work, you will need to include the author, year of publication, and the page number for the reference&quot;

&quot;If you are paraphrasing an idea from another work, you only have to make reference to the author and year of publication in your in-text reference, but APA guidelines encourage you to also provide the page number (although it is not required.)&quot;

If a page number is quoted, then actually the citation is functioning as more than a simple pointer to the reference - it is actually adding extra metadata. If the page number is not quoted, then the citation is simply an in-context pointer to the reference.

Are these important distinctions. My instinct is yes - we shouldn&#039;t refer to these two different functions in the same way technically. However, I&#039;m not sure what the implication of this is (in the context of the TELSTAR project anyway)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think in principal there is any difference between referencing a specific scene in a film, and a specific page in a book. However, what I do wonder is whether it is useful to differentiate between general references and the more specific. To take an example from the APA Guide at <a href="http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/02/" rel="nofollow">http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/02/</a></p>
<p>&#8220;If you are directly quoting from a work, you will need to include the author, year of publication, and the page number for the reference&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;If you are paraphrasing an idea from another work, you only have to make reference to the author and year of publication in your in-text reference, but APA guidelines encourage you to also provide the page number (although it is not required.)&#8221;</p>
<p>If a page number is quoted, then actually the citation is functioning as more than a simple pointer to the reference &#8211; it is actually adding extra metadata. If the page number is not quoted, then the citation is simply an in-context pointer to the reference.</p>
<p>Are these important distinctions. My instinct is yes &#8211; we shouldn&#8217;t refer to these two different functions in the same way technically. However, I&#8217;m not sure what the implication of this is (in the context of the TELSTAR project anyway)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lukas Koster</title>
		<link>http://www.meanboyfriend.com/overdue_ideas/2009/06/quick-reference/comment-page-1/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>Lukas Koster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meanboyfriend.com/overdue_ideas/?p=490#comment-248</guid>
		<description>Nice definition of &quot;resource&quot; ;-) You may want to add video, images, audio, online slideshows etc. to the list of resource examples. On line non-written resources will become more important. And have you thought about Tweets?
This also makes sense in the light of your remarks about referring to specific parts of a resource (a scene, a track, a slide, etc.). But I am not sure what the difference is with a citation for page in a book?
I do not have much experience with citations nowadays. I don&#039;t know what the rules are for this type of citations, if there are any.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice definition of &#8220;resource&#8221; <img src='http://www.meanboyfriend.com/overdue_ideas/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  You may want to add video, images, audio, online slideshows etc. to the list of resource examples. On line non-written resources will become more important. And have you thought about Tweets?<br />
This also makes sense in the light of your remarks about referring to specific parts of a resource (a scene, a track, a slide, etc.). But I am not sure what the difference is with a citation for page in a book?<br />
I do not have much experience with citations nowadays. I don&#8217;t know what the rules are for this type of citations, if there are any.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.744 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-09 17:53:26 -->

