<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Visualisation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.meanboyfriend.com/overdue_ideas/2009/07/visualisation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.meanboyfriend.com/overdue_ideas/2009/07/visualisation/</link>
	<description>Ideas linking Libraries, Computing, E-learning, and anything else that springs to mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Pattern</title>
		<link>http://www.meanboyfriend.com/overdue_ideas/2009/07/visualisation/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Pattern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meanboyfriend.com/overdue_ideas/?p=502#comment-304</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s probably worth noting that Bowker are now creating metadata for book covers (e.g. keywords that describe the elements of the book cover).  So, you&#039;d be able to find book covers that had someone holding an apple in their hand.

Sarah -- could you elaborate on your &quot;almost always wrong&quot; statement?  Wrong in what way?  I can&#039;t see it being a worse barrier than some of the hurdles we normally place in the way -- e.g. inability to find &quot;Oranges are not the only fruit&quot; on most OPACs thanks to our insistence that Boolean is good thing! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s probably worth noting that Bowker are now creating metadata for book covers (e.g. keywords that describe the elements of the book cover).  So, you&#8217;d be able to find book covers that had someone holding an apple in their hand.</p>
<p>Sarah &#8212; could you elaborate on your &#8220;almost always wrong&#8221; statement?  Wrong in what way?  I can&#8217;t see it being a worse barrier than some of the hurdles we normally place in the way &#8212; e.g. inability to find &#8220;Oranges are not the only fruit&#8221; on most OPACs thanks to our insistence that Boolean is good thing! <img src='http://www.meanboyfriend.com/overdue_ideas/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Bartlett</title>
		<link>http://www.meanboyfriend.com/overdue_ideas/2009/07/visualisation/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Bartlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meanboyfriend.com/overdue_ideas/?p=502#comment-299</guid>
		<description>It may be a  cliche that library users remember the colour of a book jacket, but in my experience as a library practitioner they&#039;re almost always wrong for some reason. So you may be creating a red herring that actually presents a barrier between the user and that item by putting in some kind of retrieval facility based on colour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may be a  cliche that library users remember the colour of a book jacket, but in my experience as a library practitioner they&#8217;re almost always wrong for some reason. So you may be creating a red herring that actually presents a barrier between the user and that item by putting in some kind of retrieval facility based on colour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
