{"id":1285,"date":"2011-09-20T13:06:49","date_gmt":"2011-09-20T12:06:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.meanboyfriend.com\/overdue_ideas\/?p=1285"},"modified":"2011-09-20T13:07:56","modified_gmt":"2011-09-20T12:07:56","slug":"koha-at-staffordshire-university","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.meanboyfriend.com\/overdue_ideas\/2011\/09\/koha-at-staffordshire-university\/","title":{"rendered":"Koha at Staffordshire University"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>David Parkes (<a href=\"http:\/\/dukedomlargeenough.blogspot.com\">http:\/\/dukedomlargeenough.blogspot.com<\/a> @<a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/daveparkes\">daveparkes<\/a>) and Paul Johnson (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.staffs.ac.uk\/informationlandscape \">http:\/\/blogs.staffs.ac.uk\/informationlandscape<\/a> @<a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/infoscene\">infoscene<\/a>) talking about the selection and implementation of open source library systems at Staffordshire.<\/p>\n<p>Institutional committment to &#8216;open&#8217; &#8211; open educational resources, open access, widening participation.<br \/>\nMaturing of open source landscape<br \/>\nRealisation there were opportunities<\/p>\n<p>Business case pretty easy to make economically &#8211; costs speak for themselves. However, more difficult to put the &#8216;risk&#8217; aspect. Institutional IT slightly wary at the start (although now fully on board) &#8211; had to work, and learn, with them.<\/p>\n<p>Very quick turn around &#8211; March 2010 decision, live with new system in August 2010<br \/>\nLibrary management systems need to talk to many many other systems on campus &#8211; perhaps unusual in this respect. LMS more complex than they realised when they started.<\/p>\n<p>Because on legacy system, with rising costs, felt had less to lose than others perhaps.<br \/>\nIn business case not just getting IT on side, but also faculty and students. Needed to understand what they needed from the system &#8211; found no particular resistance to moving, but also no particular desire to move.<\/p>\n<p>Some demand for specific things &#8211; e.g. mobile interface.<\/p>\n<p>Because of institutional strategy with regards &#8216;open&#8217;, they were able to align business case with institutional strategy. Specified in their tender that they wanted a hosted, open source, system.<\/p>\n<p>Paul describes some issues of implementation &#8211; but I&#8217;d summarise that this seemed very similar to any system implementation &#8211; issues around change of practices, new terminology, etc. etc.<\/p>\n<p>Paul describing how they worked with PTFS Europe on adding &#8216;rolling loans&#8217; functionality. Some complexities around this, and especially how fines were charged. Despite good progress decided in the end to scrap rolling loans and move to 1 and 2 day loans. The only real impact they could see was slight drop in fine revenue. Generally positive reaction from students.<\/p>\n<p>Hourly rolling loans now available in Koha &#8211; but Staffordshire unlikely to go back to this.<\/p>\n<p>Paul stresses before having custom work done, really consider if you need it.<\/p>\n<p>Paul saying how great data migration process was. Had a lot of legacy data &#8211; much of it lacking key data for discovery services &#8211; e.g. 008 only present in 15% of bibliographic data. They were able to match up with open data from the British Library to increase this to 38% of data.<\/p>\n<p>Staffs use self-service &#8211; issues with secure communication between hosted Koha system and self-issue machines on site when using SIP2.<\/p>\n<p>Overall think fair to say Staffordshire very positive about their experience of both PTFS Europe and Koha.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>David Parkes (http:\/\/dukedomlargeenough.blogspot.com @daveparkes) and Paul Johnson (http:\/\/blogs.staffs.ac.uk\/informationlandscape @infoscene) talking about the selection and implementation of open source library systems at Staffordshire. Institutional committment to &#8216;open&#8217; &#8211; open educational resources, open access, widening participation. Maturing of open source landscape Realisation there were opportunities Business case pretty easy to make economically &#8211; costs speak for themselves. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[76,77,75],"class_list":["post-1285","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-koha","tag-open-source","tag-ptfs-europe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.meanboyfriend.com\/overdue_ideas\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1285","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.meanboyfriend.com\/overdue_ideas\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.meanboyfriend.com\/overdue_ideas\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.meanboyfriend.com\/overdue_ideas\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.meanboyfriend.com\/overdue_ideas\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1285"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/www.meanboyfriend.com\/overdue_ideas\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1285\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1287,"href":"http:\/\/www.meanboyfriend.com\/overdue_ideas\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1285\/revisions\/1287"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.meanboyfriend.com\/overdue_ideas\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1285"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.meanboyfriend.com\/overdue_ideas\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1285"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.meanboyfriend.com\/overdue_ideas\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1285"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}