ALA 2008: A Has-been cataloger looks at what cataloging will be – Diane Hillmann

Diane Hillmann is Director of Metadata Initiatives and the Information Institute of Syracuse (formerly of Cornell)

There are several converging trends:

  • More catalogers work at a support staff level than as professional librarians
  • More cataloging records are selected by machines
  • More catalog records are being captured from publisher data or other sources
  • More updating of catalog records is done via batch processes
  • Libraries continue to de-emphasize processing of secondary research products (books and serials) in favour of unique, primary materials

Options:

  • Extinction
  • Retool

Extinction:

  • Keep cranking about how nobody appreciates us
  • Asert over and over that we’re already doing everything right – why should we change?
  • Adopt a ‘chicke little’ approach to envisioning the future “the sky is falling”

Retool

  • Consider what cataloger do, and what they will do, and map training
  • Look for support for retraining at many levels
  • Find a new job title – catalogers do a lot of other things

What do ‘metadata librarians’ do (as opposed catalogers – the retooled cataloger):

  • Think about descriptive data without pre-conceptions around descriptive level, granularity or descriptive vocabs
  • Consider the entirety of the discovery and access issues around a set or collection of materials
  • Consider users and uses beyond an individual service when making data design decisions

The metadata librarian is

  • aware of changing user needs
  • understands the evolving information environment
  • works collaboratively with technical staff
  • familiar with all metadata formats and encoding standards

The metadata librarian skill set is:

  • Views data as collections, sets or streams
    • Familiar with a variety of metadata formats (DC, VRA Core, MODS etc.)
    • Understands basics of data encoding (XML, RDF etc.) but is generally not a provrammer
    • Understands the various ways that data can be created (by humans or machines) and manipulated (crosswalked etc.)

Characterisitics of the New World:

  • No more Integrated Library Systems
  • Bibliographic utilities are unlikely to be the ‘central node’ for all data
  • Creation of metadata will become far more decentralized – not all library data
  • Nobody knows how this will all shake out
  • But: Metadata Librarians will be critical in forging solutions

Disintegrated Library Systems:

  • All metadata will not be managed in and delivered from one central store
    • Discovery is the first function that is being disaggregated from the ILS – there will be others
    • Metadata may be managed in a variety of databases, structures and systems

Role of bibliographic utilities:

  • Optimized to be the middleman of the traditional data sharing system
  • Currently limited to handling MARC data – not sure whether or when that will change (RDA will be firths challenge here)
  • New services are contemplated

(as an aside OCLC getting a hard time here today – feel a bit sorry for Roy!)

New models of creation and distribution

  • All data will not be created by librarians
    • some will originate from machine processes
  • We need to exchange data based on a more open model – on the web
  • Broader use of OAI-PMH is a good start towards opening data beyond applications and bespoke portals
  • Need to avoid commoditizing DATA instead base business model on building necessary SERVICES

Not sure about OAI-PMH – why not just published the stuff on a webpage with semantic markup to give structure?

Open data:

  • Nobody knows how rich our data is unless we make it fully available – we can’t compete as data providers unless we do this

 

Technorati Tags:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.